(See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. 1988) Torts, 838, p. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 ) 100 ) Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. 5 If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 11 ) Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. ) ) Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 CCP 2031.210(a). 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 ) ) She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 ) Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The court notes each of the above is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the complaint. ) ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. See, e.g. A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) 5 Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 11 ) ) ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT B. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. ) 5 Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 Law and Motion (559) 457 . All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) apply to ex parte applications. Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Reputation. 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 San Francisco, CA 94102 See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Quick Links ) Code 3294. ) ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. ) Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. 5:26.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders. 11 ) 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. 6 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 5 (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ) If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. 11 ) ) Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ) ) Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Central Pathology Service Med. ) CCP 396b(a). 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. Courtroom I. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 ) Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) 5 ) ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. ) This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. ) UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 ) (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ) (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. His life and legacy. Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. 11 ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) ) Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. 5 This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs motion to compel answers to supplemental form interrogatories (FIs) and supplemental requests for production of documents (RPODs) against UPA under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2030.290, 2031.300. ) ) No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ) It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. ) 5 (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. ) ) 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT try clicking the minimize button instead. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). ) ) Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of subd (e) effective January 1, 1992; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007; previously relettered as part of subd (f) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd. ) SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. ) apply to most motions. Court Clerk ) ) Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. will be able to access it on trellis. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) (Ibid.). 11 ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. ) The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 8:8-9. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 9 SEAN CHARLSON, ) Department: 403 CCP . ) Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). United Family Court: UFCEfiling@sftc.org. ) ) ) 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 5 (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. ) The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. The court must not require any other form of citation. 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 9 ) However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. ) (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Civic Center Courthouse ) 5 Complaint 13. Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) Palay v. Sup.Ct. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Dept. Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 5 Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Court Clerk Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. ) 5 ) 4:21-22; 5:22-23. (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Id., 4-5. ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Department 405 ) 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . ) ) (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ) ) ) Second and Sixth Causes of Action Negligence and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the causes of action for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because they are duplicative of the cause of action for medical malpractice, which Plaintiff alleges as the first cause of action. ) 5 ) ) 11 ) ) In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 5 **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. CCP 399(a). 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Complaint 13. Department rules are available here.